Friday, October 19, 2012

The Purpose of Spectacular Wealth, According to a Spectacularly Wealthy Guy

Adam Davisdon of the NYT put together this piece in which he wanted to find out how the super rich viewed the income dispersion that has garnered so much attention in the US.  To his credit Davidson met up with someone not in the 1% but in the 0.01%, Edward Conard, formerly of Bain Capital

Conrad as Davidson notes, help build the the private-equity firm by buying, fixing up and selling off companies at a profit. Conard, who retired a few years ago at 51, has wealth most likely in the hundreds of millions; he lives in an Upper East Side town house just off Fifth Avenue; and he is one of the largest donors to his old boss and friend, Mitt Romney.

Via the NYT piece here
  • Unlike his former colleagues, Conard wants to have an open conversation about wealth. He has spent the last four years writing a book that he hopes will forever change the way we view the superrich’s role in our society. “Unintended Consequences: Why Everything You’ve Been Told About the Economy Is Wrong,” to be published in hardcover next month by Portfolio, aggressively argues that the enormous and growing income inequality in the United States is not a sign that the system is rigged. On the contrary, Conard writes, it is a sign that our economy is working. And if we had a little more of it, then everyone, particularly the 99 percent, would be better off. This could be the most hated book of the year.
  • Conard understands that many believe that the U.S. economy currently serves the rich at the expense of everyone else. He contends that this is largely because most Americans don’t know how the economy really works — that the superrich spend only a small portion of their wealth on personal comforts; most of their money is invested in productive businesses that make life better for everyone. “Most citizens are consumers, not investors,” he told me during one of our long, occasionally contentious conversations. “They don’t recognize the benefits to consumers that come from investment.”
  • Marvin Orellana for The New York Times

No comments:

Post a Comment