Blair contends as other things shrink in America such as houses, cars, and our diets (not sure about that), that the banks getting smaller would be a good things for not only government but also consumers. We agree with Blair that smaller banks are probably better for our economy and the consumer, but she doesn't really lay out any concrete reasons why besides that it should be done.
Limits on leverage and increased competition are two reason that come to my mind first as to solid reasons for breaking up the banks. By reducing leverage it should reduce risks. Increasing competition would have lower costs for consumers or increase savings rates.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f70e/8f70e74dc4366704824d9d255a791025ad6942a1" alt="Why it's time to break up the 'too big to fail' banks"
No comments:
Post a Comment